Al-Saleh, C., & Bruno, A. (2006). Le débat Strawson/Austin sur la vérité: Théorie performative versus définition contextualiste. In J. Benoist (Ed.), Propositions et états de choses: Entre être et sens (pp. 119–230). Paris, France: Vrin.
Alston, W. (1964). Philosophy of language. Englewood, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Ambroise, B., & Laugier, S. (2009). Philosophie du langage: Signification, vérité et réalité. Paris, France: Vrin.
Ambroise, B., & Laugier, S. (2011). Philosophie du langage: Sens, usage et contexte. Paris, France: Vrin.
Anscombe, G. (1959). An introduction to Wittgenstein’s Tractatus. London, UK: Hutchinson University Library.
Atlas, J., & Levinson, S. C. (1981). It-clefts, informativeness and logical form: radical pragmatics. In P. Cole (ed.), Radical pragmatics (pp. 1–61). New York: Academic Press.
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Austin, J. L. (1970). Philosophical papers. London, UK: Oxford University Press.
Ayer, A. J. (1959). Logical positivism. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.
Bach, K., & Harnish, R. (1979). Linguistic communication and speech acts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Baldwin, T. (2001). Contemporary philosophy: Philosophy in English since 1945. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Baz, A. (2012). When words are called for. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Benoist, J. (Ed.). (2006). Propositions et états de choses: Entre être et sens. Paris, France: Vrin.
Benoist, J. (2011). Frege philosophe de l’esprit. In S. Laugier & S. Plaud (Eds.), La philosophie analytique (pp. 55–68). Paris, France: Ellipses.
Biletzki, A., & Matar, A. (Eds.). (1998). The story of analytic philosophy. London, UK: Routledge.
Brandom, R. (1994). Making it explicit. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Brandom, R. (2000). Articulating reasons: An introduction to inferentialism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Brandom, R. (2008). Between saying & doing: Towards an analytic pragmatism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Burkhardt, A. (1990). Speech acts, meaning and intentions: Critical approaches to the philosophy of John R. Searle. Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter.
Carnap, R. (1928). Der logische Aufbau der Welt. Berlin, Germany: Weltkreis-Verlag. English translation. (1967). The logical structure of the world and pseudoproblems in philosophy. London, UK: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Carnap, R. (1932). Überwindung der Metaphysik durch logische Analyse der Sprache, Erkenntnis, 2, 219–241. English translation, (1959). The elimination of metaphysics through logical analysis of language. In A. J. Ayer (Ed.), Logical positivism (pp. 60–81). Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
Carnap, R. (1934). Die logische Syntax der Sprache. Vienna, Austria: Springer. Translation (1937). The logical syntax der sprache. London, UK: Kegan Paul.
Carnap, R., Hahn, H., & Neurath, O. (1929). Wissenschaftliche Weltauffassung, der Wiener Kreis. Vienna, Austria: A. Wolf.
Cavell, S. (1969). Must we mean what we say? A book of essays. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Cavell, S. (1979). The claim of reason: Wittgenstein, skepticism, morality and tragedy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Cavell, S. (2005). Passionate and performative utterance. In S. Cavell & R. B. Goodman (Eds.), Contending with Stanley Cavell (pp. 177–198). Oxford University Press.
Chapman, S. (2005). Paul Grice, philosopher and linguist. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Chapman, S. (2008). Language and empiricism after the Vienna Circle. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Chemla, E., & Spector, B. (2011). Experimental evidence for embedded scalar implicatures. Journal of Semantics, 28(3), 359–400.
Chierchia, G. (2004). Scalar implicatures, polarity phenomena, and the syntax/pragmatics interface. In A. Belletti (Ed.), Structures and beyond (pp. 39–103). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Chierchia, G., Fox, D., & Spector, B. (2012). Scalar implicatures as a grammatical phenomenon. In C. Maienborn, K. von Heusinger, & P. Portner (Eds.), Semantics: An international handbook of natural language meaning (Vol. 3, pp. 2297–2331). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter.
Clark, P., & Hale, B. (Eds.). (1994). Reading Putnam. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Collins, J., & Dobler, T. (Eds.). (2018). The philosophy of Charles Travis: Language, thought, and perception. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Colloque philosophique de Royaumont. (1962). La Philosophie analytique: 4ème Colloque philosophique de Royaumont 1958. Alençon, France: Éditions de Minuit.
Crary, A., & Read, R. (2000). The new Wittgenstein. London, UK: Routledge.
Davidson, D. (1967). Truth and meaning. Synthese, 17, 304–323.
Davidson, D. (1969). True to the facts. Journal of Philosophy, 66, 748–764.
Davidson, D. (1970). Semantics for natural languages. Reprinted in D. Davidson, Inquiries into truth & interpretation, 1985 (pp. 55–64). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Davidson, D. (1985). Inquiries into truth & interpretation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Davidson, D. (1989). A coherence theory of truth and knowledge. In E. Lepore (Ed.), Truth and interpretation: Perspectives on the philosophy of D. Davidson (pp. 307–332). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
Davidson, D. (1990). The structure and content of truth. Journal of Philosophy, 87, 279–328.
Diamond, C. (1995). The realistic spirit: Wittgenstein, philosophy and the mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Donnellan, K. (1966). Reference and definite descriptions. The Philosophical Review, 75(3), 281–304.
Donnellan, K. (1972). Proper names and identifying descriptions. In D. Davidson & G. Harman (Eds.), Semantics of natural language. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel.
Donnellan, K. (1979). The contingent a priori and rigid designator. In P. French, T. Uehling, & H. Wettstein (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives in the philosophy of language. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Ducrot, O. (1972). Dire et ne pas dire. Paris, France: Herman.
Dummett, M. (1973). Frege: Philosophy of language. London, UK: Duckworth. Second edition (1981). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Dummett, M. (1978). Truth and other enigmas. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
Dummett, M. (1993). Origins of analytical philosophy. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Evans, G. (1976). The causual theory of names. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 80, 187–208.
Evans, G., & McDowell, J. (Eds.). (1976). Truth and meaning. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
Fann, K. T. (Ed.). (1969). Symposium on J. L. Austin. London, UK: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Fillmore, C. (1969). Verbs of judging: An exercise in semantics description. Paper in Linguistics, 1(1), 91–117.
Floyd, J., & Shieh, S. (Eds.). (2001). Future pasts: The analytic tradition in twentieth-century philosophy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Foster, J. (1976). Meaning and truth theory. In G. Evans & J. McDowell (Eds.), Truth and meaning (pp. 1–32). Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
Fox, D. (2007). Free choice and the theory of scalar implicatures. In U. Sauerland & P. Stateva (Eds.), Presupposition and implicature in compositional semantics (pp. 537–586). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Frege, G. (1879). Begriffsschrift, eine der arithmetischen nachgebildete Formelsprache des reinen Denkens. Halle, Germany: Nebert. Partial translation in Geach, P. T., & Black, M. (Eds.). (1970). Translations from the philosophical writings of Gotttlob Frege. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Frege, G. (1884). Die Grundlagen der Arithmetik. Breslau, Germany: Koebner. English translation (2007). The foundations of arithmetic. New York: Pearson Longman.
Frege, G. (1892). Über Sinn und Bedeutung. Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik, 100, 25–50. Translation in Geach, P. & Black, M. (1970). Philosophical writings of Gottlob Frege (pp. 56–78). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
Frege, G. (1893). Grundgesetze der Arithmetik (Vols. 1 and 2). Iena: Pohle. Partial translation in Furth, M. (Ed.). (1964). The basic laws of arithmetic. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Frege, G. (1923). Gedankengefüge. Beiträge zur Philosophie des deutschen Idealismus, 3, 36–51. Translation in McGuinness, B. (Ed.). (1984). Gottlob Frege: Collected papers. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Frege, G. (1977). Logical investigations (edited with a preface by P. T. Geach). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
Geurts, B., & Pouscoulous, N. (2008). No scalar inferences under embedding. In P. Egré & G. Magri (Eds.), Presuppositions and implicatures (pp. 106–117). Boston, MA: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.
Glock, H.J. (1996). A Wittgenstein dictionary. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Godart-Wendling, B., & Goubier, F. (2015). A la recherche d’une notion non stabilisée: La présupposition à l’aune des exponibilia et des approches contemporaines. Cahiers de lexicologie, 2(107), 203–222.
Godart-Wendling, B., & Raïd, L. (2016). A la recherche de la présupposition, London, UK: ISTE Editions.
Grice, P. H. (1989). Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Gupta, A. (1980). The logic of common nouns. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Hacker, P. (1975). Insight and illusion: Wittgenstein on philosophy and the metaphysics of experience. London, UK: Oxford University Press.
Hacker, P. (1996). Wittgenstein’s place in twentieth-century analytic philosophy. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Heijenoort, J. van. (1967). From Frege to Gödel. A source book in mathematical logic, 1879–1931. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hughes, C. (2004). Kripke: Names, necessity, and identity. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Kaplan, D. (1977). Demonstratives: An essay on the semantics, logic, metaphysics, and epistemology of demonstratives and other indexicals. Reprinted in J. Almog, J. Perry, & H. Wettstein (Eds.), Themes from Kaplan, 1989, (pp. 481–563). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Kaplan, D. (1978). Dthat. In P. Cole (Ed.), Syntax and Semantics: Vol. 9.Pragmatics (pp. 221–243).
Kaplan, D. (1979). On the logic of demonstratives. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 8(1), 81–98.
Kaplan, D. (1990). Thoughts on demonstratives. In P. Yourgau (Ed.), Demonstratives. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Karttunen, L. (1974). Presupposition and linguistic context. Theoretical Linguistics, 1, 3–44.
Kempson, R. M. (1975). Presupposition and the delimitation of semantics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Kneale, W., & Kneale, M. (1962). The development of logic. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
Kripke, S. A. (1963). Semantical analysis of modal logic. Mathematical Logic Quarterly, 9(5–6), 67–96.
Kripke, S. A. (1972). Naming and necessity. In D. Davidson, G. Harman, Dordrecht, D. Reidel Publishing Company (Eds.), Semantics of natural language. Reprinted in 1980 by Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.
Kripke, S. (1982). Wittgenstein: On rules and private language. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
Laugier, S. (1992). L’anthropologie logique de Quine: L’apprentissage de l’obvie. Paris, France: Vrin.
Lepore, E. (Ed.). (1986). Truth and interpretation: Perspectives on the philosophy of D. Davidson. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
Lepore, E., & Ludwig, K. (2005). Donald Davidson: Meaning, truth, language, and reality. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Lewis, D. (1968). Counterpart theory and quantified modal logic. Journal of Philosophy, 65(5), 113–126.
Lewis, D. (1973). Counterfactuals. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Lewis, D. (1979). Scorekeeping in a language-game, Journal of Philosophical Language, 8, 339–359.
Lewis, D. (1983). Philosophical papers. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Lewis, D. (1986). On the plurality of worlds. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Lewis, D. (2008). Convention: A philosophical study. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Linsky, L. (1967). Referring. London, UK: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Linsky, L. (1977). Names and descriptions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Ludlow, P. (1997). Readings in the philosophy of language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Mey, J. (1985). Whose language? A study in linguistic pragmatics. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
Mill, J. S. (1843). A system of logic: Ratiocinative and inductive, London, Longmans, Green and Co. Reprinted in 2002 by the University Press of the Pacific.
Monk, R. (1991). Ludwig Wittgenstein: The duty of genius. London, UK: Vintage Books.
Montague, R. (1968). Pragmatics. Reprinted in R. H. Thomason (Ed.), Formal philosophy: Selected papers of Richard Montague, 1974, (pp. 95–118). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Moore, G. E. (1966). Lectures on philosophy. London, UK: Allen & Unwin.
Mounce, H. O. (1997). The two pragmatisms. London, UK: Routledge.
Passmore, J. (1966). A hundred years of philosophy (2nd ed.). London, UK: Penguin.
Putnam, H. (1975). The meaning of “meaning.” In Putnam (Ed.), Philosophical papers II: Mind, language and reality (pp. 131–193). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Putnam, H. (1981). Reason, truth and history. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Putnam, H. (1983). Realism and reason. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Quine, W. V. O. (1934). “Ontological remarks on the propositional calculus.” Mind, XLIII(172), 472–476.
Quine, W. V. O. (1936). Truth by convention. In O. H. Lee (Ed.), Philosophical essays for A. N. Whitehead (pp. 90–124). New York, NY: Longmans, Green.
Quine, W. V. O. (1948). On what there is. Review of Metaphysics, 2, 21–38.
Reprinted in Quine, W. V. O. (1953). From a logical point of view (pp. 1–19). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Quine, W. V. O. (1951). Two dogmas of empiricism. Philosophical Review, 60, 20–43.
Reprinted in Quine, W. V. O. (1953). From a logical point of view (pp. 20–46). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Quine, W. V. O. (1953). From a logical point of view. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Quine, W. V. O. (1958). Le mythe de la signification. Reprinted in Cahiers de Royaumont. La philosophie analytique. 1962, Paris, France: Editions de Minuit.
Quine, W. V. O. (1960a). Carnap on logic truth. Synthese, 12, 350–374.
Reprinted in Quine, W. V. O. (1966). The ways of paradox and other essays (pp. 100–125). New York, NY: Random House.
Quine, W. V. O. (1960b). Word and object. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
Quine, W. V. O. (1966). The ways of paradox and other essays. New York, NY: Random House. Second edition, enlarged (1976). Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Quine, W. V. O. (1969). Ontological relativity and other essays. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
Quine, W. V. O. (1970). Philosophy of logic. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Quine, W. V. O. (1974). The roots of reference. La Salle, IL: Open Court.
Quine, W. V. O. (1990). Pursuit of truth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Quine, W. V. O. (1991). Two dogmas in retrospect. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 21, 265–274.
Ramsey, F. P. (1927). Facts and propositions. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume 7, 6–20.
Recanati, F. (2010). Truth-conditional pragmatics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Rivenc, F. (1998). Sémantique et vérité: De Tarski à Davidson. Paris, France: Presses Universitaires de France.
Rorty, R. (Ed.). (1967). The linguistic turn. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Russell, B. (1903). Principles of mathematics. London, UK: Allen and Unwin.
Russell, B. (1905). On denoting. Mind, 14(56), 479–493.
Russell, B. (1918–1919). The philosophy of logical atomism. The Monist, 28, 495–527; 29, 190–222 and 344–380. Reprint in 2010, London, UK: Routledge.
Russell, B. (1940). An inquiry into meaning and truth. London, UK: George Allen & Unwin.
Sauerland, U. (2004). Scalar implicatures in complex sentences. Linguistics and Philosophy, 27, 367–391.
Sbisà, M., & Turner, K. (2013). Pragmatics of speech actions. Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.
Schilpp, P. A. (Ed.). (1963). The philosophy of Rudolf Carnap. La Salle, IL: Open Court.
Searle, J. R. (1958). Proper names. Mind, 67, 166–173.
Searle, J. R. (1962). What is a speech act? In M. Black (Ed.), Philosophy in America. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Searle J. R. (1969). Speech acts. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Searle, J. R. (1983). Intentionality: An essay in the philosophy of mind. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Searle, J. R. (1995). The construction of social reality. New York, NY: The Free Press.
Sellars, W. (1975). Action, knowledge and reality. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.
Soames, S. (2003). Philosophical analysis in the twentieth century (2 vols.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Stalnaker, R. (1970). Pragmatics. Synthese, 22, 272–289.
Stalnaker, R. (1973). Presupposition. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 2(4), 447–457.
Stalnaker, R. (1974). Pragmatic presuppositions. In M. K. Munitz & P. K. Unger (Eds.), Semantics and philosophy: Essays (pp. 47–62). New York: New York University Press.
Stalnaker, R. (1978). Assertion. In P. Cole (Ed.), Syntax and semantics 9. New York, NY: Academic Press.
Stalnaker, R. (1999). Context and content. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Stalnaker, R. (2002). Common ground. Linguistics and Philosophy, 25(5–6), 701–721.
Strawson, P. F. (1949). Truth. Analysis, 9(6), 83–97.
Strawson, P. F. (1950). Truth. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary, 24.
Strawson, P. F. (1950). On referring. Mind, 59, 320–344. Reprinted in (1971). Logico-linguistic papers (pp. 1–27). London, UK: Methuen.
Stroll, A. (2000). Twentieth-century analytic philosophy. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
Tarski, A. (1933). Der Wahrheitsbegriff in den formalisierten Sprachen. Studia Philosophica, 1, 261–405. Translation in (1944). The semantic conception of truth. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 4, 341–375.
Tarski, A. (1956). The concept of truth in formalized languages. In Tarski (Ed.), Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
Tarski, A. (1967). Truth and proof. Scientific American, 220, 63–77.
Travis, C. (1996). Meaning’s role in truth. Mind, 105(419), 451–466.
Travis, C. (1997). Pragmatics. In C. Wright & B. Hale (Eds.), A companion to the philosophy of language. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Urmson, J. O. (1956). Philosophical analysis: Its development between the two world wars. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Van Fraassen, B. (1968). Presupposition, implication, and self-reference. Journal of Philosophy, 65(5), 136–152.
Van Rooij, R., & de Jager, T. (2012). Explaining quantity implicatures. Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 21(4), 461–477.
Waismann, F. (1945). Verifiability. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary 19, 101–164.
Wanderer, J. (2008). Robert Brandom. Stocksfield, UK: Acumen.
Weiss, B. (2002). Michael Dummett. Stocksfield, UK: Acumen.
Whitehead, A. N., & Russell, B. (1910–1913). Principia mathematica (3 vols.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 2nd ed., 1925 (Vol. 1), 1927 (Vols. 2, 3); abridged as (1962). Principia Mathematica to *56, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Wittgenstein, L. (1921). Tractatus logico-philosophicus. In Annalen der Naturphilosophie. Reprinted (1922). London, UK: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
Wittgenstein, L. (1958). The blue and brown books. New York, NY: Harper Perennial.
Wittgenstein, L. (1969). On certainty. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
FAQs
History of Analytic Philosophy of Language? ›
From about 1910 to 1930, analytic philosophers like Frege, Russell, Moore, and Russell's student Ludwig WittgensteinLudwig Josef Johann Wittgenstein (/ˈvɪtɡənʃtaɪn, -staɪn/ VIT-gən-s(h)tyne; German: [ˈluːdvɪk ˈjoːzɛf 'joːhan ˈvɪtɡn̩ʃtaɪn]; 26 April 1889 – 29 April 1951) was an Austrian philosopher who worked primarily in logic, the philosophy of mathematics, the philosophy of mind, and the philosophy of language.https://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Ludwig_Wittgenstein
It originated around the turn of the twentieth century as G. E. Moore and Bertrand Russell broke away from what was then the dominant school in the British universities, Absolute Idealism.
What is the history of philosophy of language? ›Ancient philosophy
In the West, inquiry into language stretches back to the 5th century BC with Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, and the Stoics. Linguistic speculation predated systematic descriptions of grammar which emerged c. the 5th century BC in India and c. the 3rd century BC in Greece.
In fact, the philosophy of mind has never been more preoccupied with language use. Analytic philosophy, in all its flavors, then presumes mathematical logic and scientific research as central to its interests and methods, and both of these endeavors rely heavily on an understanding of language.
Was Moore a founder of analytic philosophy? ›George Edward Moore OM FBA (4 November 1873 – 24 October 1958) was an English philosopher, who with Bertrand Russell, Ludwig Wittgenstein and earlier Gottlob Frege was among the initiators of analytic philosophy.
What did analytic philosophy emerge as a reaction against? ›Analytic philosophy is a school of thought that emerged in the early 20th century in reaction to Einstein's theory of relativity and developments in turn of the century mathematics.
Was Wittgenstein an analytic philosopher? ›Contrary to currently popular ''irrationalist'' interpretations, Wittgenstein was an analytic philosopher in all phases of his career, albeit an exceedingly exotic one whose style transcends the limits of academic philosophy in general.
Who is the father of philosophy of language? ›Locke's emphasis on individual words, as well as the foundational role he assigned to psychology, were attacked by the German logician Gottlob Frege (1848–1925), who is generally regarded as the father of modern philosophy of language.
What are the main ideas of analytic philosophy? ›Analytic philosophy is characterized by a style of clarity of prose and rigor in arguments, making use of formal logic and mathematics, and, to a lesser degree, the natural sciences. It is further characterized by an interest in language and meaning known as the linguistic turn.
Is Chomsky an analytic philosopher? ›Chomsky's work happens to fall in the line of analytic philosophy, where logic and language are central to theorisation.
Why did Moore reject idealism? ›
Common Sense and Certainty. An important aspect of Moore's rejection of idealism was his affirmation of a 'common sense' realist position, according to which our ordinary common-sense view of the world is largely correct.
What does Moore believe in? ›Moore's non-naturalism comprised two main theses. One was the realist thesis that moral and more generally normative judgements – like many of his contemporaries, Moore did not distinguish the two – are true or false objectively, or independently of any beliefs or attitudes we may have.
What is Moore's argument against skepticism? ›Moore's argument is not simply a flippant response to the skeptic. Moore gives, in Proof of an External World, three requirements for a good proof: (1) the premises must be different from the conclusion, (2) the premises must be demonstrable, and (3) the conclusion must follow from the premises.
What is the origin of analytical psychology? ›Carl Jung was the Swiss psychologist and psychiatrist who founded analytic psychology. His work has been influential in psychiatry and in the study of religion, literature, and related fields.
What is the origin of analytical? ›The earliest known use of the word analytic is in the mid 1500s. OED's earliest evidence for analytic is from around 1566–7, in the writing of George Buchanan, poet, historian, and administrator. analytic is a borrowing from Latin. Etymons: Latin analyticus.
Where is the origin of philosophy? ›Western philosophy originated in Ancient Greece in the 6th century BCE with the pre-Socratics. They attempted to provide rational explanations of the cosmos as a whole. The philosophy following them was shaped by Socrates (469–399 BCE), Plato (427–347 BCE), and Aristotle (384–322 BCE).
What is analytic philosophy according to Bertrand Russell? ›Analytic philosophy as practiced by Russell logically analyzes concepts, knowledge, and language to say what there is and how we know it. Analysis is a significant part of analytic philosophy and its role in the movement is largely due to Russell.